Which of the following statements best describes strict liability?

The concept of strict liability is best captured by the statement that refers to liability regardless of fault or intent. In strict liability cases, a party can be held responsible for damages or injuries caused by their actions or products, even if they did not intend to cause harm or were not negligent. This legal principle is often applied in situations involving inherently dangerous activities, defective products, or specific animal ownership cases, where the risk is significant and the law imposes responsibility irrespective of the level of care taken.

In contrast, liability that depends on intentional harm implies a requirement of intent, which is not a characteristic of strict liability. Similarly, the notion that liability is negotiable does not align with strict liability principles, as the responsibility is typically clear-cut and mandated by law. Lastly, suggesting that strict liability applies only in property cases restricts its scope since it also pertains to personal injury and various other circumstances. Thus, the defining feature of strict liability is that it operates independently of intent or fault, making the chosen statement accurate and comprehensive.